<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DataSecurityPolicies.com &#187; Document Retention Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datasecuritypolicies.com/category/security-policies/document-retention-policy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datasecuritypolicies.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:21:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Document Retention Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.datasecuritypolicies.com/document-retention-policy</link>
		<comments>http://www.datasecuritypolicies.com/document-retention-policy#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Document Retention Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Security Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Record Retention Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datasecuritypolicies.com/document-retention-policy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eMag has a great overview of how to develop your document retention policy here. Here’s an excerpt: EVERY company should have a formal document retention policy, and this policy must be actively enforced. When a company or business is on notice of pending litigation, it is required to implement a &#8220;Litigation Hold&#8221; to retain any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eMag has a great overview of how to develop your document retention policy <a target="_blank" href="http://www.emaglink.com/newsletter_archive/newsletter_December_2006.htm">here</a>.</p>
<p>Here’s an excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p>EVERY company should have a formal document retention policy, and this policy must be actively enforced. When a company or business is on notice of pending litigation, it is required to implement a &#8220;Litigation Hold&#8221; to retain any information or documents that the organization reasonably believes are discoverable in the anticipated litigation. Failure to properly implement such a hold can result in large damage claims for the opposing part, as evidenced by the landmark spoliation ruling in Zubulake (<span style="font-style: italic">Zubulake v. UBS Warburg (&#8220;Zubulake V&#8221;), 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13574 (July 20, 2004)</span>. Morgan Stanley faced a $1.4 billion award in compensatory and punitive damages stemming from its lack of knowledge about the location of its discoverable information (<span style="font-style: italic"> Coleman (Parent) Holdings v. Morgan Stanley, 2005 Extra LEXIS 94 (Fla Cir. Ct. Mar. 23, 2005) </span>. Likewise, a company may have email or other electronic records that were excluded by an under-inclusive preservation order, thus opening up the entire catalog of archived electronic records to scrutiny by the courts. Sanctions may be imposed where a party has not only acted in bad faith or gross negligence, but also through ordinary negligence (<span style="font-style: italic">Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Fin. Corp. 306 F.3d 99</span>).</p></blockquote>
<p>This is very useful information for justifying the need to write, implement and enforce your own document retention policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.datasecuritypolicies.com/document-retention-policy/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
